The human machine is not the mind.
We think we 'do' and 'decide' but it is done for us and we respond unconsciously. Then we claim that 'I' did it. We rationalise what happened after the fact as if we had planned it consciously all along.
This article from the Economist suggests that decisions on what to think and what to do and even the solving of problems are done before they reach consciousness.
So who do we think we are? The machine which thinks and acts unconsciously? Or the consciousness that perceives after the event?
Is there any way we can rescue the 'common-sense' view that we decide what to do and then do it? Or does thinking just get in the way of decisions already made deep inside the human machine?
The study of 'artificial intelligence' mostly studies functions (like the ability to play chess, for example). It seems clear that functions can be carried out prior to (and perhaps without the help of) consciousness.